{"id":6179,"date":"2018-02-02T12:38:03","date_gmt":"2018-02-02T16:38:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/?p=6179"},"modified":"2018-02-02T12:38:03","modified_gmt":"2018-02-02T16:38:03","slug":"attorney-demolishes-pro-vaccine-talking-points-lays-bare-the-shocking-facts-about-vaccination-risks-and-dangers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/attorney-demolishes-pro-vaccine-talking-points-lays-bare-the-shocking-facts-about-vaccination-risks-and-dangers\/","title":{"rendered":"Attorney Demolishes Pro-Vaccine Talking Points, Lays Bare The Shocking Facts About Vaccination Risks And Dangers"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n\"1557717_344387152365862_1014456932_n\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Attorney Exposes Super-vaccination Agenda, Lays Foundation For Lawsuits Against Government And Big Pharma<\/h2>\n

State of the Nation<\/a><\/p>\n

SOTN Editor’s Note:
\n<\/strong>The following expos\u00e9 on vaccine safety and their inherent dangers is noteworthy because it is written by a Washington State attorney who really understands the profound legal ramifications. James Deal, J.D. wastes no time in completely deconstructing the many false assertions that are routinely presented by those government and corporate entities promoting a Super-Vaccination<\/em> agenda<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

More importantly, Attorney Deal furnishes the American people with the substantive legal arguments which can serve as the basis for lawsuits against both the Pharmaceutical Industry and the U.S. Federal Government. \u00a0When considered in the aggregate, the implicit points of law delineated below constitute a legal foundation for a clear-cut criminal indictment<\/strong>. \u00a0Great harm is being inflicted on the children throughout the country by mandatory, state-sponsored vaccination programs.<\/p>\n

No entity under the sun has the right or lawful authority to arrogate power unto itself to harm or injure,\u00a0sicken or infect,\u00a0paralyze or kill the people of this nation<\/strong>. \u00a0Not only is such conduct by the state a serious breach of the social contract, it represents a profound violation of the public trust. \u00a0Vaccination programs therefore break the inviolable bond between the citizenry and the government.<\/p>\n

Most importantly, the systematic administration of state-mandated childhood vaccines\u00a0constitutes a highly dangerous and deadly\u00a0criminal enterprise<\/strong>. \u00a0Those government officials and corporate co-conspirators responsible for this ongoing chemical assault\u00a0ought to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.<\/p>\n

State of the Nation
\n<\/a>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<\/p>\n

VACCINES: AN ATTORNEY\u2019S VIEWPOINT<\/strong><\/h1>\n

You Cannot Generalize Pro or Con About All Vaccines<\/h3>\n

James Robert Deal J.D.<\/p>\n

\"justice<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

The report below was recently sent to every representative and senator in the Washington legislature and to all the newspapers in Washington. Attorney James Deal believes that the personal or philosophical objection will be retained\u00a0at the state level.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThey have all the money, but we have all the good ideas. If we persevere, we will succeed.\u201d
\n<\/strong>~ James Robert Deal, J.D.<\/strong><\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

Anti-vaxxers oppose all vaccines. Pro-vaxxers favor all vaccines. No, it is not that simple. Pro-vaxxers admit that certain groups should not receive certain vaccines and that vaccine injury does happen, although it is \u201crare<\/a>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Most so-called anti-vaxxers actually favor some vaccines but oppose others. Most oppose giving many vaccines all at one time. Most say they are only asking for safer vaccines.<\/p>\n

Amid the name calling, there is a reasonable middle ground. Dr. Mark Geier<\/a>, M.D., Ph.D., associated with Johns Hopkins and the National Institutes of Health, author of over a hundred peer reviewed journal articles, is a moderate we should pay attention to. (Go to YouTube and search for \u201cDr. Mark Geier Thimerosal\u201d.)<\/p>\n

<\/span>Dr. Geier<\/a> supports the measles-only vaccine, but he opposes the MMR, measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, because it has caused confirmed adverse reactions and death. Likewise, Dr. Gregory Poland<\/a>, of the Mayo Clinic holds that the MMR is largely ineffective.<\/p>\n

It is lazy language to say that vaccines are \u201csafe and effective\u201d, because that implies that all vaccines are safe and effective for all people. In fact, some vaccines have done great harm. If you doubt this, read the findings of the\u00a0Vaccine Court<\/a>, which has paid out around $3.0 billion to children for adverse reactions which admits were caused by vaccines. Go to\u00a0www.uscfc.uscourts.gov\/opinion-search<\/a> and search for \u201cmeasles-mumps-rubella\u201d or \u201cinfluenza\u201d.\u00a0 And read the package inserts that come with vaccine boxes. You may also read them online at www.immunize.org\/packageinserts<\/a><\/h3>\n

In Europe only the polio vaccine is mandatory<\/a>. Dr. Geier supports vaccination against polio. However, he is adamantly opposed to flu vaccines. The flu vaccine given almost universally uses Thimerosal as a preservative. Each dose of Thimerosal contains 25 micrograms of ethyl mercury. Multiplied by Avogadro\u2019s Number, 25 mcg = 75 quadrillion atoms of mercury.<\/p>\n

25 x 10-6<\/sup> \/ 200 x 6.02 x 10-23<\/sup><\/p>\n

10-6<\/sup> x 10-23<\/sup> = 10-17<\/sup><\/p>\n

25 \/ 200 x 6.02 = .7525<\/p>\n

.7525 x 10-17 <\/sup>= 7.5 x 10-16 <\/sup>= 75 x 10-15 <\/sup>=<\/p>\n

75,000,000,000,000,000 = 75 quadrillion<\/p>\n

The only safe amount of mercury is zero, and using mercury as a preservative is reckless, especially since it is given yearly, even to pregnant mothers, even though the package insert<\/a>\u00a0admits that the MMR has not been tested for fetal safety in pregnant women. Mercury passes through the placenta and into the fetus. There are flu vaccines which are mercury free.<\/h3>\n

The flu vaccine is big business, particularly the ones containing mercury. Some 300 million doses are sold<\/a>, while only 20 million doses of all other vaccines are sold. In 1986 the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program<\/a>made vaccine manufacturers immune from most liability, and in 2011 the Supreme Court<\/a> twisted the plain language of the Vaccine Act to make vaccine manufacturers, hospitals, and physicians completely immune from absolutely ALL liability, reasoning that vaccines in general \u2013 using the language of the Court \u2013 are \u201cunavoidably unsafe\u201d.<\/p>\n

Dr. Geier points out that all flu vaccines are illegal. All vaccines must pass two double blind tests for safety and effectiveness. Because a new vaccine is developed each year in advance of the flu season, and because each vaccine assumes a prediction of which strains of flu will be present, there is no time to two double blind studies, which would take several years.<\/p>\n

Our vaccines can contain aluminum<\/a>, formaldehyde<\/a>, MSG, antibiotics, and monkey kidney cells<\/a>. The effort to develop safe and effective vaccines should continue, however, we must admit that we are still at a primitive stage in the development of vaccines, which is why mandating vaccination makes little sense.<\/p>\n

The unvaccinated are blamed for spreading disease, however, every person injected with the MMR and other attenuated live virus vaccines develops a vaccine version of the disease, sheds viruses, and can infect others<\/a>. It is not only the unvaccinated who are spreading measles, which is another reason why mandating vaccination makes little sense.<\/p>\n

Measles is not a trifling malady, however, it is not Ebola. Measles cases and deaths from measles declined sharply before the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963<\/a>. Relatively few die from measles.<\/p>\n

Since 1986, Health & Human Services reports<\/a> 669 deaths from the DTP, 84 deaths from flu vaccines, 80 deaths from the DTaP, 57 deaths from the MMR, 54 deaths from the Hepatitis B vaccine, and many more non-fatal adverse reactions. The science of vaccination is still in a primitive stage, and it is inappropriate for the state to force injection of a possibly harmful drug on behalf of mega-corporations which are completely immune from all liability for adverse reactions.<\/p>\n

Further, one who is vaccinated sheds viruses<\/a>, and so one can be infected not only by those who contract a wild case of measles but also by those recently vaccinated. Moreover, the MMR is not particularly effective \u201cIn an October 2011 outbreak in Canada, over 50% of the 98 individuals had received two doses of measles vaccine<\/a>\u201d.<\/p>\n

The Los Angeles Times<\/a> and the Everett Herald<\/a> printed an article entitled \u201cVaccine ignorance proving deadly and contagious<\/a>\u201d. It was written not by physicians or scientists but by prominent members of the Council on Foreign Relations. It contains numerous inaccuracies \u2013 scientific, historical, and legal.<\/p>\n

Thinking people support vaccines which are safe, effective, and necessary. Conversely, thinking people should oppose those vaccines which are not safe, not effective, or not necessary.<\/p>\n

Law school taught me to break a question down into its component parts: Which vaccines are safe, effective, and necessary, and for whom? How deadly is the disease to be prevented? How likely are adverse reactions and how bad can they be? The CFR authors are uncritical cheer leaders for the $30 billion per year vaccine business, exhorting us to take all recommended vaccines unquestioningly and by the dozens and dozens.<\/p>\n

The authors repeat slanders made against Dr. Andrew Wakefield<\/a>, which were completely false<\/a>. A recent NOVA special, \u201cVaccines \u2013 Calling the Shots\u201d, repeats these now-disproven slanders, a case of lazy journalism. Recall that Wakefield wrote in the Lancet in 1998<\/a> that colitis<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0autism spectrum<\/a>\u00a0 disorders are linked to the\u00a0combined measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine<\/a> then in use.<\/p>\n

Wakefield was denounced as a vaccine denier, although he supported and still supports the single dose measles vaccine, as well as other vaccines. He only opposed the MMR. Multiple vaccines given simultaneously can be more harmful than single vaccines. For questioning the safety of one vaccine, Wakefield was \u201clynched\u201d by GlaxoSmithCline and the medical establishment. Wakefield\u2019s results have been replicated in at least 28 studies done by scientists in other countries<\/a>. Further, Wakefield has great insight in how to treat children who have had\u00a0adverse vaccine reactions<\/a> by treating the gastro-intestinal disease that accompanies adverse reactions.<\/p>\n

Wakefield was expelled from the medical profession in Great Britain, however, John Walker-Smith, one of the co-authors of the offending 1998 study, challenged his expulsion and was recently reinstated<\/a>, an indication that Wakefield could be reinstated if he applied. Wakefield works in Texas as a researcher and is suing Brian Deer<\/a>, Fiona Godlee and the British Medical Journal for falsely accusing him of fraud.<\/p>\n

The CFR authors also seem to be unaware that Wakefield was further vindicated recently when Dr. William Thompson of the CDC \u201ccame out\u201d. Thompson was one of the authors of a CDC study which denied any causal link between vaccines and autism. Thompson admitted that in a 2004 article he and other authors had intentionally excluded already collected data<\/a>, data which would have reversed their published conclusion that there is no vaccine-autism link. The mainstream media has glossed over the story of Wakefield\u2019s vindication and Thomson\u2019s confession<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A mother is not a vaccine denier if she questions the safety of a vaccine containing mercury, aluminum, MSG, antibiotics, eggs, or formaldehyde<\/a>. Or Beta HCG hormone<\/a>. Or the urabi virus<\/a> . She is not a denier if her child is frail or has already had an adverse vaccine reaction and she chooses to opt her child out. She is not a denier if she questions giving children 49 injections of 14 vaccines by age six<\/a>, including a vaccine at\u00a0birth<\/a> for hepatitis B, a disease usually infecting IV drug users. Nor is she a denier if she declines the CDC recommendation<\/a> that she take the flu vaccine (containing mercury) when she is pregnant, even though the flu vaccine is not tested for safety<\/a> for pregnant women and fetuses and the\u00a0FDA advises it be used<\/a> \u201conly if clearly needed\u201d.<\/h3>\n

Most are not harmed by vaccines, but some are. For proof read the decisions of the Vaccine Court<\/a>, which has\u00a0paid out some $3.0 billion<\/a> and has acknowledged that specific vaccines have caused specific harms. See the disclosure inserts which comes in vaccine boxes. Ask your pharmacist for copies. Multi-dose flu vaccine contains a whopping 25 micrograms<\/a> of mercury per dose, included as a preservative. That\u2019s 74 quadrillion atoms of mercury. The single dose version contains under 1.0 micrograms, only 3 quadrillion atoms \u2013 still too much for me. The mercury in the flu vaccine passes through the placenta and is especially toxic to fetus and infant because their cells are dividing rapidly. Mercury<\/a> affects cell division<\/a>. The use of mercury as a preservative should be banned.<\/p>\n

Some vaccines are ineffective<\/a>. Discover Magazine reported that 73 percent of kids aged 7 to 10 who caught pertussis in 2012 in Washington had been fully vaccinated<\/a>. The same is true for the measles vaccine<\/a>. A child vaccinated with a live virus vaccine experiences a mild version of the infection and is thus contagious and infects others<\/a>. Outbreaks of measles and pertussis probably come from the vaccinated, not from the unvaccinated. The artificial immunity conferred by vaccines wears off, and boosters are required, making vaccines a cash machine that generates $30 billion yearly.<\/p>\n

A reasonable question to ask is this: If vaccines worked, those who favor indiscriminant vaccination should not object to those who choose not to be vaccinated.<\/p>\n

The problem worsened in 1986. Before that date vaccine liability had always been decided according to state law regardless of which court the case was brought in. 1986 Congress federalized all vaccine liability claims. A law\u00a0was passed<\/a> requiring that all claims for vaccine harm go to a special \u201cVaccine Court<\/a>\u201d, where there was and is no jury and no pre-trial discovery. The statute of limitations is tricky and short, and the burden to prove a specific vaccination harmed a child is arbitrarily difficult. Vaccine makers are shielded\u00a0against general liability<\/a> and even for\u00a0badly designing<\/a> a vaccine. Claims are paid out of a fund built up with a tax on each vaccine dose sold. This has led vaccine makers to become reckless, to do insufficient testing of vaccines, and to industrialize the vaccine business.<\/p>\n

Before 1986, vaccination had been a technology aimed at the most deadly and contagious diseases. Vaccines were to be put into use only after careful testing. Vaccines were and are needed when a potentially fatal disease progresses so fast the body cannot respond before death occurs. Because adverse reactions are inevitable, vaccines should not be used to prevent diseases which are rarely fatal. However, vaccine makers, newly exempt from all liability, turned necessary vaccination against the most deadly diseases into a mass-production money machine targeted against any and every conceivable disease.<\/p>\n

Vaccine makers ship vaccines banned in the West to the Third World, such as the urabi strain MMR vaccine<\/a>, the\u00a0dangerous partially attenuated oral polio vaccine used in Pakistan<\/a>, and a tetanus vaccine which causes miscarriages<\/a> \u2013 none of which would inspire one to trust what vaccine makers say<\/a>.<\/p>\n

All drugs and all vaccines involve some risk which the CDC admits in its assurances that serious harm or death is rare<\/a>. If the risk of taking the vaccine is greater than the risk of enduring the disease, one has the right to refuse to take the vaccine. Adults can refuse vaccination for themselves. They are the guardians of their children. They know their children\u2019s frailties and previous bad experiences with vaccines. They have the right to opt their children out. If vaccinations work, there should be no objection if some choose not to be vaccinated.<\/p>\n

Washington has recently made it more difficult<\/a> for parents to decline vaccination for their children. Unvaccinated children can be sent home<\/a> if there is an outbreak of a childhood disease in his or her school, which is odd since\u00a0the CDC admits, in the case of pertussis, it is vaccinated children who are spreading the disease<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Despite all the evidence that some vaccines cause serious harm, many so-called experts exhort us that all vaccines are safe and effective, and most people stubbornly believe them. Why? Mark Twain explained it best \u201cIt\u2019s much easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled.<\/p>\n

Examine the evidence for yourself and do your own thinking. Administration of vaccine in mass quantities should not be mandatory, and some vaccines should be banned outright.<\/p>\n

The connection between the fluoride scam and the vaccine scam is that they are both run by mega corporations without ethical standards.<\/p>\n

We should not be afraid to follow the science where ever it logically goes and be outspoken on other contaminations, such as Roundup, which I just learned is sprayed on non-GMO wheat as a dessicant, so most non-organic bread is loaded with Roundup.<\/p>\n

Recommended Reading<\/p>\n

5 1\/2 month-old infant dies after 8 vaccines IN ONE DAY\u2014> \u2018SIDS\u2019 Put On Death Certificate —\u00a0Then the hospital refuses to issue an autopsy report!<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6179","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6179"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6179\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6180,"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6179\/revisions\/6180"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thehealthcoach1.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}